Rachel ([info]roozle) wrote,
@ 2009-08-26 15:34:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
if you live in MA, another thing you can do about health care reform
I want to signal boost [info]cos's useful and encouraging things you can do to help the public option post. If you live in MA, let me take a minute of your time to suggest one more thing.

Senator Kennedy's death last night was not a surprise. He requested, before his death, to have the legislature change the rules to have someone appointed to his seat rather than waiting for a special election. It's really important that we have a supporter of health care reform in the Senate filling that seat, making 60 Senate Democrats instead of 59, as soon as possible. I wrote a letter (behind the cut tag) to my state senator. [ My state senator happens to be a Republican, but one of those Republicans who crossed the aisle to vote for gay marriage in MA back before it was actually obvious that if you did that you got to keep your seat. And really, he does a great job representing the local district so I have been voting for him for years anyway. So that's some of the backstory on the tone of this letter. ] But whoever your local state representatives are: if you call or write them right now and say, "we need someone representing Massachusetts holding that crucial Senate seat at this important time", if we do get that extra vote in the US Senate it could be important for making the difference when things are this close.

Adapt my letter, write your own, say your own thing. Let your stat reps know that this is important and that you need their action now.


Dear Senator Tisei,

On numerous occasions I have seen you take the high road on political questions, the one that truly serves your constituents rather than narrowly partisan goals. And that’s why, despite my Democratic party affiliation, it’s been my pleasure to repeatedly vote for you to represent me. I write to you tonight, asking you to make another such stand by supporting Senator Kennedy’s request for a legal change allowing a successor to be appointed to his Senate seat as quickly as possible.

Health care reform in Massachusetts has been a success story that has helped shape the debate for the rest of the nation. With only 2.5% of the population uninsured here, no one can claim any more that it can’t be done. I strongly believe that it is in the best interests of us all for the guarantee of coverage to be available to all Americans, not just those lucky enough to reside here. But for Massachusetts to have a fair voice in the health care debate that will be taking place this fall, we will have to take the extraordinary step of changing the rules by which a replacement senator can be appointed.

I believe we should take this step. Not just because it is Senator Kennedy’s dying wish, a way to make sure that the years of leadership he’s put into health care reform, that have in some ways brought us to the current point, are recognized and brought to fruition. But because at this critical time, the residents of Massachusetts should have all the representation that they are entitled to.

At this point, it will take great leadership from the legislature to take this important action. Please help us all do our part to improve the state of health for all the nation by acting on a rule change for senatorial succession.

Thank you for your attention,



(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]chienne_folle
2009-08-27 12:45 am UTC (link)
Thank you for this, Rachel. I'm still stunned by Teddy's loss, even though it was expected, but what you've done fits his memory a lot better than lying around feeling stunned.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chienne_folle
2009-08-27 12:54 am UTC (link)
You and I share the same state senator, and I agree with you about him. I'm not sure why he's a Republican, but he's one of the Good Guys.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]miss_chance
2009-08-27 06:32 pm UTC (link)
I can't say I support this. If it was a conservative republican passing away, I'd feel really upset if they tried to have the legislature use public grief to improve their chances of changing the rules and appoint a new republican replacement rather than have a special election. So I can't get behind if when it's someone on my side of things, either.

I think if special elections are problematic, the question can only be reasonably raised when there *isn't* an open seat.

But changing the rules because it's important that we have someone on our side of a political question feels really, really wrong and like a dangerous precident to me. I certainly wouldn't want the other side to be able to do that.

And, too, I'm not sure which "rules" this is, but if how the death of senators is handled is outlined in the Constitution, I definitely don't want the importance of a specific partisan position, even if it's one I hold, to push a rush changing of the constitution.

I think I have a little too much of my mom, the ACLU lawyer in me to support this. She was always extremely clear that if you want your side to have a certain power or freedom, you have to be willing for people you don't want to have it, too.

Edited at 2009-08-27 06:33 pm UTC

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]dda
2009-08-28 04:49 pm UTC (link)
And, too, I'm not sure which "rules" this is, but if how the death of senators is handled is outlined in the Constitution...

According to my iPhone Constitution (yeah, there is an app for that :-), Amendment XVII states:

"When vacancies happen in the representation of any state in the Senate, the executive authority of such state shall issue writes of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, that the legislature of any state may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct." (any typos mine). Massachusetts approved this on May 22, 1912

This seems to me to say that the Governor can appoint a emergency backup Senator until a special election can be called, provided the state legislature votes them the power to do so. But it is clearly the desire of this amendment to fill that seat by election as soon as possible.

There may be other articles of the Constitution that override this; I didn't do a thorough search.

Health care reform in Massachusetts has been a success story that has helped shape the debate for the rest of the nation.

I certainly do not believe this; I believe just the opposite as the cost of providing this health care clearly shows.

ETA: Update comments


Edited at 2009-08-28 05:14 pm UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…